In
many family law cases, it is common that parties agree or judges will order
parents to alternate claiming the children as dependants on their State and
Federal Income tax returns (or that each claim one child in each year).
However, as discussed in the article below, the Decree of Dissolution or
Court’s Order may not be adequate to effectuate the terms in the Decree.
The
problem stems from the fact that, in order for the noncustodial parent to claim
the child(ren) on her/his tax return, the custodial parent must sign the IRS
Form 8332, thereby relinquishing her/his right to claim the children as
dependants for that tax year.
The
advice in this article is practical and, unfortunately, correct. If one party
refuses to sign the IRS Form 8332 required by the noncustodial parent to claim
the child(ren) on his/her tax return, the issue can become a headache to remedy
due to the time and attorneys fees associated with correcting the issue. Thus,
if you believe your ex-spouse may be inclined to act in contravention of the
terms of your Decree, you may consider focusing on other terms/issues and
concede on the issue of claiming the child(ren) on your individual tax
returns.
While
measures may be taken to ensure one party's compliance, such as including language that the
party who does not comply with the terms of the Decree be responsible for any
attorneys fees incurred by the complying party to effectuate its provisions, if
the violating party does not have the money to pay the awarded attorneys fees,
this may be a futile request (and the basis of their erroneously claiming the
exemption to begin with).
For
the full-text article please visit the following link: http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/09/25/dependency-exemptions-divorce-court-orders-not-binding-on-tax-court/
No comments:
Post a Comment